Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting a score of 89 against 79.8. Google Pixel 5 is a newer and a little bit lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, but it is a little thicker. Google Pixel 5 features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher display density and a lot better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Galaxy A30s has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A30s also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 2% larger battery size. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.