Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A50s's 86.6 overall score. Even though Google Pixel 5 is just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A50s, it's a bit lighter and newer. Google Pixel 5 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A50s takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.