Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 5, with a 90.8 score against 89. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, we must highlight that it is also a heavier and a little thicker cellphone. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a way better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.