Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 5's 89 score. The Galaxy A52 construction is just a little thicker and notably heavier than the Google Pixel 5. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 5 has a little faster processor than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 has a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.