Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 5's 89 score. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy A52 5G construction is just a bit thicker and extremely heavier than the Google Pixel 5. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a much larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.