Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a little bit better than Google Pixel 5, with a 91.1 score against 89. Even though Galaxy A52s is newer than Google Pixel 5, it's extremely heavier and a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52s counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4080mAh. Galaxy A52s captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a much larger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.