Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Galaxy A70, having a general score of 89 against 76.9. The Google Pixel 5 is a lighter device than Galaxy A70, but both have the same thickness. Google Pixel 5 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger sensor providing a better image quality and faster 60 fps video frame rates. Galaxy A70 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.