Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-15 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Galaxy C7, having an 89 score against 77.7. Google Pixel 5's design is incredibly newer and lighter than Galaxy C7's, but it is somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 5 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy C7, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit greater pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Google Pixel 5 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 5 has superior battery life than Galaxy C7, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.