Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F41's score of 85.2. The Google Pixel 5 design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy F41, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Samsung Galaxy F41 features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy F41 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.