Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy F62's overall score of 88.1. Although the Google Pixel 5 and the Galaxy F62 were only released with a couple months difference, the Google Pixel 5 is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
The Galaxy F62 has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel quantity in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit larger screen. Galaxy F62 has a superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way bigger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a lot better resolution back camera.
Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.