Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a bit better than the Google Pixel 5, with a 97.6 score against 89. Galaxy Fold is an older and heavier device than Google Pixel 5, but Samsung made it thinner anyway. Galaxy Fold has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. The Google Pixel 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Fold both count with really similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, and they both have a same size back camera sensor, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy Fold has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold has a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 5. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 5, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.