Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than Samsung Galaxy M20, getting an 89 score against 78.9. Google Pixel 5's design is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M20. Google Pixel 5 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density. The Galaxy M20 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy M20 has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.