Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M30's overall score of 82.4. Google Pixel 5's body is newer, lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy M30. Google Pixel 5 has a little better performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Google Pixel 5 takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy M30 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30 features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.