Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 430 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than the Galaxy M51, having an 89 score against 87.7. Google Pixel 5 is a way lighter and thinner phone than Galaxy M51, although both were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bit better pixels amount in each inch of display.
The Galaxy M51 has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 5 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. Galaxy M51 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.