Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Google Pixel 5's score of 89. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Google Pixel 5, we must tell that it's also way heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little higher pixels density and a larger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back, a lot better video quality and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 5. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 5, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.