Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Galaxy Note 5, getting an 89 score against 79.3. Google Pixel 5's construction is much newer and lighter, but a bit thicker than the Galaxy Note 5. Google Pixel 5 features a better performing processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Google Pixel 5 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a camera with a way lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Google Pixel 5 costs more money than the Galaxy Note 5, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.