Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 89 score against 80.4. The Google Pixel 5 is a a bit lighter phone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but they are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back camera with more MP.
The Google Pixel 5 features superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 5 is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.