Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 global score. Google Pixel 5 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but both are equally thin. The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a little better display pixels density. The Google Pixel 5 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with faster video frame rates and a more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy Note7 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 5 features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.