Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S10e's general score of 86.3. The Google Pixel 5 construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy S10e, but it's a little heavier. The Galaxy S10e features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 5, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy S10e has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Galaxy S10e features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10e also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 5 has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4080mAh battery size. The Galaxy S10e's camera is just as good as Google Pixel 5's camera, because although the Galaxy S10e has a camera with lesser mega pixels and a worse video quality, and they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is more expensive than Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S10e. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S10e, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.