Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Google Pixel 5, with a global score of 98 against 89. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better cellphone than Google Pixel 5, it must be noted that it's also a notably heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a larger display, a quite higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a lot better video resolution and a way higher 108 MP resolution back camera. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 5. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.