Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Google Pixel 5, getting a 95.4 score against 89. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than Google Pixel 5, it is notably heavier and thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite better display pixel density.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much memory to store more apps and games as Google Pixel 5, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 5 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 5. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 5, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.