Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | -- |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.33 ounces | -- |
| Just black and Sorta sage | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S25's 82.6 general score. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit larger display.
The Galaxy S25 takes way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos, it also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels, a way better video definition and a lot bigger sensor. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with as much storage for apps and games as Google Pixel 5, both have the same internal memory.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 4080mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Google Pixel 5 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.