Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | -- |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.33 ounces | -- |
| Just black and Sorta sage | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Google Pixel 5, with a overall score of 90.7 against 89. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is noticeably thinner and way lighter than Google Pixel 5. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos, a way higher video quality and a way higher 200 MP resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.