Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. The Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen density.
Google Pixel 5 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a back camera with lot less MP and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations.
The Google Pixel 5 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4080mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more money than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.