Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Galaxy S7's general score of 79.5. Google Pixel 5's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy S7, but it is just a little bit lighter. The Galaxy S7 counts with a better display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Google Pixel 5 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Google Pixel 5 captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a more MP back-facing camera and higher video frame rate.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.