Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. The Google Pixel 5 design is way lighter and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were released with only a couple months difference. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in Google Pixel 5, although the Galaxy XCover Pro has just 4050mAh of battery size against 4080mAh. The Google Pixel 5 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Google Pixel 5 is more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.