Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 global score. The Google Pixel 5 design is somewhat lighter but just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little better performance than Google Pixel 5. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 has longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 24 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Google Pixel 5 count with extremely similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a back facing camera with a lower 12 MP resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, they both have a same size back camera sensor.
The Google Pixel 5 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.