Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, having an 89 score against 85.6. The Google Pixel 5 is an older and thicker phone than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but Google managed to make it lighter anyway. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Google Pixel 5, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 5. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 5 features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a camera in the back with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Google Pixel 5 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.