Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 5's 89 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is just a little thinner but heavier than the Google Pixel 5, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 5. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM. Google Pixel 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5G count with really similar cameras, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size sensor.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a little more money than Google Pixel 5, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.