Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 5, getting a global score of 90.6 against 89. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is newer and thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 5. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. The Google Pixel 5 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.