Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | -- |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 5's 89 score. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is notably heavier but incredibly thinner than Google Pixel 5. Google Pixel 5 has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a really larger display and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better 200 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 5. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 5, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.