Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 score. Google Pixel 5's construction is noticeably newer, just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Xperia XZs. Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better display than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a little bit greater pixel amount per display inch, a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better processor than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Google Pixel 5 counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos, faster video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 5 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.