Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than Sony Xperia Z4v, having a global score of 89 against 78.8. The Google Pixel 5 construction is way newer, just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Sony Xperia Z4v. The Xperia Z4v has a sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xperia Z4v's CPU is very similar to the Google Pixel 5 one, because although the Xperia Z4v has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, it also counts with an additional GPU.
Google Pixel 5 features a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity. Xperia Z4v has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back facing camera with a way better 20.7 MP resolution.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Sony Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Sony Xperia Z4v. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Sony Xperia Z4v, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.