Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, having an 89 score against 76.1. Even when Google Pixel 5 and TCL 20 Pro 5G were only released with a couple of months difference, Google Pixel 5 is extremely lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 5 features a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
TCL 20 Pro 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better processing unit than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
TCL 20 Pro 5G captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.