Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting a score of 89 against 78.7. Google Pixel 5 is a much lighter and thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel number in each screen inch.
The Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.