Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having an 89 score against 78.2. Google Pixel 5's construction is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, although they were released only 1 months apart. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a quite higher pixel density.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 5 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 47 percent larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.