Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with an 89 score against 81.6. Although Google Pixel 5 and the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC were released only 1 months apart, Google Pixel 5 is noticeably lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 5 has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images in low-light environments and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.