Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Google Pixel 5 has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bit higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 47% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.