Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | -- |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's score of 86.1. Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably lighter and a little bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's CPU is very similar to the Google Pixel 5 one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, a quite larger display and a just a little better pixel density. The Google Pixel 5 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro have very similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have the same internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way higher 108 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.