Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | -- |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, having a score of 89 against 77.1. Google Pixel 5's design is just a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a little bit larger screen, a quite higher pixel number per display inch and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features improved battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.