Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, having a score of 89 against 83. Even though the Google Pixel 5 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T were released only a few months apart, the Google Pixel 5 is way lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.