Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-21 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the Google Pixel 6a, with a score of 88.1 against 76.4. The iPhone X is an much older cellphone than the Google Pixel 6a, but Apple managed to build it a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. IPhone X counts with a very superior CPU than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 6 processing cores, the iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone X has a better display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each inch of display and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution. Apple iPhone X features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 6a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 6a features a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4410mAh of battery capacity. IPhone X takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments, a back facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video definition.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 6a. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 6a, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.