Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 431 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 6a's 76.4 global score. The HTC One M9 is a older and a little thicker phone than Google Pixel 6a, but HTC was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. These phones come with Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12.
The HTC One M9 features a lot better looking screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels per inch of display. HTC One M9 has an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit, a 64-bits processor and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The HTC One M9 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a much smaller aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the HTC One M9 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera. Google Pixel 6a features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 6a features a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4410mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
HTC One M9 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.