Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Pixel 6a, with a score of 81.3 against 76.4. LG V35 ThinQ's body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Google Pixel 6a, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior processing unit than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 more processing cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a sharper screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a bit better number of pixels in each inch of display. LG V35 ThinQ takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a way higher resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 6a has greater battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4410mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.