Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Google Pixel 6a's score of 76.4. Even though LG Velvet is older and a little heavier than Google Pixel 6a, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. LG Velvet has a much greater performance than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG Velvet also has a larger number of faster cores.
LG Velvet counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a quite larger screen. LG Velvet has a much better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot more megapixels camera.
LG Velvet counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 6a counts with a little better battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 3% greater battery capacity.
LG Velvet is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.