Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-07-21 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than Google Pixel 6a, with an 86.6 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Google Pixel 6a, although it was released many years before. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 6a has Android 12.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better performing processor than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 2 more cores.
The Galaxy A50s features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
The Google Pixel 6a counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4410mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.