Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is much better than the Google Pixel 6a's 76.4 general score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version. Even though Galaxy A71 is older and just a little heavier than Google Pixel 6a, it's construction is still somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy A71 has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much better performing CPU than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos in low-light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Google Pixel 6a one, although the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.