Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Google Pixel 6a, having a global score of 90.8 against 76.4. The Galaxy Note 20 is an older and just a little heavier phone than Google Pixel 6a, but Samsung managed to build it just a bit thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much powerful CPU than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and a back-facing camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better video definition.
The Google Pixel 6a and the Galaxy Note 20 feature similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory. The Google Pixel 6a features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4410mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 6a, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.