Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Google Pixel 6a, having a 98.9 score against 76.4. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Google Pixel 6a has Android 12, so it gives a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 6a, but Samsung managed to make it a bit thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a little larger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better processing power than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a battery life that's just as good as Google Pixel 6a's battery life, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way higher 108 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 6a, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.