Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2022-07-21 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass, Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Tensor (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G78 MP20 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a's 76.4 score. Although Galaxy Note 3 is older than Google Pixel 6a, it's construction is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Google Pixel 6a has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a really superior processing power than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Galaxy Note 3 features a better looking screen than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Google Pixel 6a counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser MP and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos. The Google Pixel 6a counts with slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 6a has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4410mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.